tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7870013.post8770850187433284607..comments2008-10-22T06:37:41.496-07:00Rob Frankelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11321315004780963386noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7870013.post-9769200832408701862008-10-22T06:37:00.000-07:002008-10-22T06:37:00.000-07:00The whole point isn't about the sanctity of marriage, but the intrusion of government! Put aside how you define what marriage is or is not. Conservatives make a big deal out of keeping government contained -- but want the government involved in defining what you and I do in our private lives? Liberals, who want the government to tell us how to do everything, all of a sudden DON'T want the government to tell them what to do? THAT'S what's nutty. And that's the point of the piece.Rob Frankelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11321315004780963386noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7870013.post-56733086580010389772008-10-21T22:39:00.000-07:002008-10-21T22:39:00.000-07:00Nice word play on the real meaning of conservative but you didnt tackle this issue at all. I am all for gays and lesbians getting some of the rights of marriage, such as visiting the dying loved one. But they dont need to have the official title of being married and destroy the sanctity of being married. The ease of divorce i think is actually doing more damage in our society than gay marriage would, but i still believe the sanctity of marriage should be protected from same sex "marriage"rangermofohttp://openid.aol.com/rangermofonoreply@blogger.com